Individual throttle bodies setup ( pics and videos )
06-26-2015, 01:59 AM
#52
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 97' Hyundai Coupe
I want to keep it NA for now, cause the plan is to go drive it on track. Its nice , but slow track with a lot of corners and all turbo cars got beat by less powerful NA cars.
The distance between the engine and firwall is too small for the plan that I had so I decided to do it like this. I have to put airbox, cause i want to drive it daily and with long velocity stack will be very hard. Thats just my 2 cents
I don't want to weld the TBs because of the heat transfer and when connect the ITBs with silicone hoses , they almost touch the firewall.
We'll see how it will run with this setup and if I'm not happy I will make same changes
Video is coming very soon
The distance between the engine and firwall is too small for the plan that I had so I decided to do it like this. I have to put airbox, cause i want to drive it daily and with long velocity stack will be very hard. Thats just my 2 cents
I don't want to weld the TBs because of the heat transfer and when connect the ITBs with silicone hoses , they almost touch the firewall.
We'll see how it will run with this setup and if I'm not happy I will make same changes
Video is coming very soon
07-08-2015, 12:33 AM
#54
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 97' Hyundai Coupe
Here is a short onboard clip.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3VtQxizfYo[/media]
More videos with better quality are coming
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3VtQxizfYo[/media]
More videos with better quality are coming
07-08-2015, 10:27 PM
#57
Super Moderator
That does sound good. It's a little crazy to think that's the same engine as in my car, sounding so different.
Then again, my car sounds better than it did, just from modifying the intake tract so ...
Then again, my car sounds better than it did, just from modifying the intake tract so ...
07-09-2015, 07:31 AM
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2003/Hyundai/Tiburon
You might also think about running the O2 signal through the SMT8 so you can modify the signal if you haven't already. Works good to get the stock ECU to help tune things out.
07-09-2015, 08:29 AM
#59
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 97' Hyundai Coupe
I've done that 
But I didn't play with this option.
Last night it was showing 14.4 - 14.8 when cruising 1200-3000rpm. I know that I can modify the signal so the ECU won't correct it, but I'm not sure how it will help with the tune ?!
U mean that I can modify it to show the stock ECU that is a bit rich so it can lean things out ?
Any help is highly appriciated
But I didn't play with this option. Last night it was showing 14.4 - 14.8 when cruising 1200-3000rpm. I know that I can modify the signal so the ECU won't correct it, but I'm not sure how it will help with the tune ?!
U mean that I can modify it to show the stock ECU that is a bit rich so it can lean things out ?
Any help is highly appriciated
07-10-2015, 07:32 AM
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2003/Hyundai/Tiburon
Bingo!! You can add or subtract voltage from the O2 signal and trick the stock ECU into doing what you want. Most times N/A engines work fine just by changing the MAF signal though.