Will This FPR Work With Our Cars?
http://www.hyundaiaftermarket.org/images/vendor1.png
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Vehicle: x3 accent gk tiburon santa fe
the regulator has a restrictor in it..
so with a high flowing fuel pupm (over 200lph) fuel presure control is 2unstable at idle, meaning instead of running 43.5 psi (with vacuum off) you'll run around 55 (vacuum on or off) becasue the regulator doesn,t flow enough to let extra fuel back to thje fuel tank
so with a high flowing fuel pupm (over 200lph) fuel presure control is 2unstable at idle, meaning instead of running 43.5 psi (with vacuum off) you'll run around 55 (vacuum on or off) becasue the regulator doesn,t flow enough to let extra fuel back to thje fuel tank
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 6
From: San Antonio, TEXAS!!!
Vehicle: 01 Tiburon Turbo, 99 Tiburon F2E, 2013 Avalon XLE Touring
QUOTE (cbehage @ Mar 12 2006, 12:11 PM)
Are you talking about the stock return line under the rail being to small or he section of the stock FPR?
The section that doesnt get replaced in the B&M's version. The lower half.
Hondas and probably others have the same problem with them.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,244
Likes: 0
From: Ashland, KY
Vehicle: 2001/Hyundai/Tiburon
your not going to need the 255 till a pretty high level of boost are you? does anyone have an idea at what level that might be an issue?
because you can always use a turbo dsm pump or the 190 walbro and I'm sure people have used them up to about 12-16 psi.
I'm planning on using the vortech fmu with the gsx pump cause it was a cheap, quick solution. btw, does anyone know, should you disconnect the vaccuum to the stock fpr in a situation like that?
edit: btw, i'm not saying getting a 255 isn't a good idea. just for me right now this was an easy first step. everything i'm doing to fuel cost me less than $100, but eventually I'll upgrade to a setup like jon's. (~$300?) with a fuel computer management of some kind, hopefully airborne's ecu
double edit: just did a bit more research, that fpr looks an aweful lot like the one they make for carburated engines. and it's not vacuum relative.
http://www.aeromotiveinc.com/pdetail.php?prod=17
because you can always use a turbo dsm pump or the 190 walbro and I'm sure people have used them up to about 12-16 psi.
I'm planning on using the vortech fmu with the gsx pump cause it was a cheap, quick solution. btw, does anyone know, should you disconnect the vaccuum to the stock fpr in a situation like that?
edit: btw, i'm not saying getting a 255 isn't a good idea. just for me right now this was an easy first step. everything i'm doing to fuel cost me less than $100, but eventually I'll upgrade to a setup like jon's. (~$300?) with a fuel computer management of some kind, hopefully airborne's ecu
double edit: just did a bit more research, that fpr looks an aweful lot like the one they make for carburated engines. and it's not vacuum relative.
http://www.aeromotiveinc.com/pdetail.php?prod=17
http://www.hyundaiaftermarket.org/images/vendor1.png
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Vehicle: x3 accent gk tiburon santa fe
you need to hook up the vacuum line.
that way fuel pressure wil lincrease based on a 1:1 ratio with boost it wil lalos be lowered when vacuum (cruise) is applied
that way fuel pressure wil lincrease based on a 1:1 ratio with boost it wil lalos be lowered when vacuum (cruise) is applied
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,244
Likes: 0
From: Ashland, KY
Vehicle: 2001/Hyundai/Tiburon
QUOTE (Denisst99 @ Mar 12 2006, 08:04 PM)
you need to hook up the vacuum line.
that way fuel pressure wil lincrease based on a 1:1 ratio with boost it wil lalos be lowered when vacuum (cruise) is applied
that way fuel pressure wil lincrease based on a 1:1 ratio with boost it wil lalos be lowered when vacuum (cruise) is applied
that makes sense, looking back on it, i'm not sure why i questioned it. jon I agree, thats just pushing it a little too far when you can get them so cheap.