blitz

Hey guys

yesterday I did some runs on the dyno with some minor mods. Cai, 1.8 cam, head work and apexi neo. My car is with siemens ecu so maybe thats why the neo did its job

150hp and 200nm ( 147.5 ft lb )

faithofadragon

hate it when dynos dont show what the correction factor is, heck, i dont even know why people want "corrected" dynos in the first place

blitz

Nobody asks u! I asked for whp and it was 130 whp. U do the math... More important for me is the graph.

faithofadragon

if you wanted a fake graph why did you pay for a dyno? I could've made you one for free in ms paint







also 14% correction factorn for 1800 feet above sea level. wow

XGODZX

It's reported the Stock G4GM 1.8 L (1795 cc) DOHC engine with a larger 82 mm bore. Output is up to 130 horsepower at the flywheel (96 kW) at 6000 rpm and 126 ft.lb of torque (170 Nm) at 4200 rpm. The G4GF 2.0L (1975cc) shares the larger 82 mm bore of the 1.8 but is stroked to 93.5 mm. Output is 140 horsepower at the flywheel (102 kW) at 6000 rpm and 133 pound force-feet (180 N·m).

blitz

Fake graph right... U see the difference between the two runs right )) especially for u I'll post the whp results , cause I love u u mean 14% is not right for fwd?!?

faithofadragon

0% is correct in a dyno. a correction factor is for people who wanna pretend. it assumes how much better your car would run at sea level in perfect weather. fwd/rwd/awd/banana doesnt matter, the correction isn't supposed to be used for assuming drivetrain losses on a dyno that determines WHEEL horsepower.



also smootches, your country is shitty btw

blitz

They use Din correction and I'm ok with it. He'll send me the whp graph so what's the problem u ugly woman? Whp, bhp... I'm happy with the improvement and the car runs smoother also this summer my coupe will be boosted and urs will be a f*cking statue

JonGTR

Visionz

Love seeing RD's still being built and dyno'd on a regular basis! Good job, and keep up the build process!