Turbo & Supercharge (Forced Induction) Posts regarding Turbochargers, Superchargers and any other method for Forced Induction.

Intake Manifold ('s)

Old Dec 14, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #31  
Hyundai4g63T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Vehicle: Had 96 Elantra Wagon
Default

QUOTE (KAW21100 @ Dec 14 2006, 05:22 PM)
now im not aeronautics expert or nuttin but that looks like shit to me lol.. I mean fine it has velocity stacks but its not flush against the IM, wouldnt that mean interferance with the air coming in?
^^ in reference to the pictured DSM IM


No it has been proven in flow test that if you raise the velocity stacks up the air will enter the runners more evenly. And Marco (Owner of Magnus) has done numerous flow bench test on his IM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #32  
hamhead's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 0
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

OBX one is for non turbo... 420A motor, not 4G63T.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #33  
Carrera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Vehicle: 2001/Hyundai/Tiburon
Default

o thats interesting, exactly why im not an engineer lmao.gif


But yeah, look at those images I posted up, looks like the right IM for us? no?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #34  
Hyundai4g63T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Vehicle: Had 96 Elantra Wagon
Default

/\ The first one would be the easiest to cut and adapt it to a Hyundai flange.

Here is what I did to mine:



You can see I added a Mustang 70mm Flange and TB to mine.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #35  
Carrera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Vehicle: 2001/Hyundai/Tiburon
Default

wow amazing job, yeah for some reason i had been under the impression that we got the same bolt pattern as mitsu heads... and this whole mustang TB thing, what year mustang? the Fuel injected 5.0? sweet work on BBTB btw =P feel a big difference?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #36  
Hyundai4g63T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Vehicle: Had 96 Elantra Wagon
Default

I know there is a difference but my setup has changed so much that I can't say how much the modified IM and 70mm added. Plus I had cut all the IACV stuff off the back and ported the inside, then rewelded it up.

It is from a 4.3l Mustang 93-96.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #37  
Carrera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Vehicle: 2001/Hyundai/Tiburon
Default

IACV?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 12:16 AM
  #38  
SOCKS_old's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

idle air control valve, its that big sensor thing behind your manifold, it sucks in air while your TB is closed to keep your car idling, im guessing he took his off, because it idles with some setting in the standalone.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 05:43 AM
  #39  
Ericy321's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,799
Likes: 0
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

hmmm Id like to know more about removing this. you still running prs4 tim? pm me about this
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 06:22 AM
  #40  
12SecRD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Vehicle: 2000 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

QUOTE (SOCKS @ Dec 15 2006, 04:46 AM)
idle air control valve, its that big sensor thing behind your manifold, it sucks in air while your TB is closed to keep your car idling, im guessing he took his off, because it idles with some setting in the standalone.



There is no setting for IAC removal. I haven't been using mine for 3 yrs now. There is no performance gains from not using it.
Reply


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 AM.