Cams
02-13-2008, 02:51 PM
#12
http://www.hyundaiaftermarket.org/images/vendor1.png
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brampton Ontario
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: Two 97 RD Tibs and 2010 Genesis Coupe
Question here is WHO is ruuning a 1.8L or XD cam on a boosted 2L..
Would less overlap be better?
Would less overlap be better?
02-14-2008, 03:25 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 1998/Hyundai/Tiburon FX
Less overlap would be better if you want more low end torque and less top end torque.
I believe if he were to swap back to a 1.8 cam he would definately lose some power, but that is only my opinion and I have no seat experience with the mentioned changes on a turbo car so...
As far as the cam timing goes, anyone that could answer my above questions??
Thanks so much.
I believe if he were to swap back to a 1.8 cam he would definately lose some power, but that is only my opinion and I have no seat experience with the mentioned changes on a turbo car so...
As far as the cam timing goes, anyone that could answer my above questions??
Thanks so much.
07-17-2008, 01:50 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll go to the dyno next wednesday 30th. I have 264 intake cam and stock exhaust cam. With no cam timing modifications i have a lot of overlap (higher emissions) and less vacuum but the car still runs good. I'm thinking of retarding just the intake cam... Also i'll take the 1.8 intake cam in case i need to swap it.
09-04-2008, 02:06 AM
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 2.0lse Coupe/tiburon
BUMP:
did you manage to get down to the dyno? has it shown any gains?
relating to an above post regarding overlap: i thought the 1.8 cam was the same duration as the 2.0l? just different lift?.
Aaron
did you manage to get down to the dyno? has it shown any gains?
relating to an above post regarding overlap: i thought the 1.8 cam was the same duration as the 2.0l? just different lift?.
Aaron
09-04-2008, 06:04 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had an issue with my cluth so couldn't visit the dyno yet... I swapped to the stock cam again because the 264 gives a lot of overlap on a F/I setup good for high rpm's... The cam works but i'd say it performs better on a N/A engine... Right now that 264 cam is on a N/A engine waiting for more parts...
09-05-2008, 12:17 AM
#17
http://www.hyundaiaftermarket.org/images/vendor1.png
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: x3 accent gk tiburon santa fe
if you use larger cams on a turbo motor and especially if those cams were grinded for a NA engine you need to dial them in
you want to run the intake cam advanced and the exhaust cam retarded
this will also make them run smoother
in my car my crower's 264 idle almost like stock
i did a car with a set of CatCams,dialed them for turbo use and the idle is also smooth
tdonnel, wich cams do you have in it?
you want to run the intake cam advanced and the exhaust cam retarded
this will also make them run smoother
in my car my crower's 264 idle almost like stock
i did a car with a set of CatCams,dialed them for turbo use and the idle is also smooth
tdonnel, wich cams do you have in it?
09-05-2008, 12:23 AM
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 2.0lse Coupe/tiburon
what overlap are you running with those 264's?
iv just got the Catcam 250's and they run 30deg overlap. - with stock being 18deg as i have read above ?
Aaron
iv just got the Catcam 250's and they run 30deg overlap. - with stock being 18deg as i have read above ?
Aaron