Woohoo!
08-26-2005, 08:03 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Hyundai Tiburon
Oh well you never proved me wrong.
130WHP on a 138-140 HP stock, is a pretty good accomplishment all the same. Considering there pretty basic mods, but expensive I know.
Props to you.
130WHP on a 138-140 HP stock, is a pretty good accomplishment all the same. Considering there pretty basic mods, but expensive I know.
Props to you.
08-26-2005, 08:14 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Lunas, New Mexico, USA.
Posts: 34,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon, 2004 Kia Sorento, 2010 Kia Soul
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (OdessitPashka @ Aug 26 2005, 07:26 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>pretty sad...
So, I guess AIRRAM is a waste of money like I've been saying for the past year...
<div align='right'><{POST_SNAPBACK}></div></div>
LOL
Nope, wrong as usual. It's allready been proven on Wattsup4800's engine.
Ford was just a moron with his install on it and everything. Let's not get this whole discussion going again shall we? You gave up on the tib, Ford gives up on all of his stuff. Everyone that has an Airram has sworn by it and loves it.
But, without a BEFORE dyno, we don't know much do we?
So, I guess AIRRAM is a waste of money like I've been saying for the past year...
<div align='right'><{POST_SNAPBACK}></div></div>
LOL
Nope, wrong as usual. It's allready been proven on Wattsup4800's engine.
Ford was just a moron with his install on it and everything. Let's not get this whole discussion going again shall we? You gave up on the tib, Ford gives up on all of his stuff. Everyone that has an Airram has sworn by it and loves it.
But, without a BEFORE dyno, we don't know much do we?
08-26-2005, 09:59 PM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000/Hyundai/Tiburon
ONLY 130WHP!? WTF? That is really sad..... I feel sorry for you. All those mods and that's it? I really wonder how pathetic the stock WHP really is. Man, now I really gotta go turbo if I want decent numbers. This is depressing. sad.gif
08-26-2005, 10:19 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Lunas, New Mexico, USA.
Posts: 34,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon, 2004 Kia Sorento, 2010 Kia Soul
???
Shouldn't be depressing at all. An improvement is an improvement, he loves the way the car drives now.
Shouldn't be depressing at all. An improvement is an improvement, he loves the way the car drives now.
08-26-2005, 10:22 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 11,992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: Hyundai Tiburon FX
my sister's 2000 tiburon is so much faster than my car!!
sis' 2000 tib: all stock except for motoria cat-back. it's just owns my poor car.
my 1997 tib: headers, AEM CAI, high flow cat, cat-back exhaust. not a shark, a turtle!
when you drive the two and compare it's like comparing a sheep to a tiger!
isn't there a way to get a cleaning service done at the dealershit? like an engine power flush or something that gets the grime out so it runs more efficiently?
sis' 2000 tib: all stock except for motoria cat-back. it's just owns my poor car.
my 1997 tib: headers, AEM CAI, high flow cat, cat-back exhaust. not a shark, a turtle!
when you drive the two and compare it's like comparing a sheep to a tiger!
isn't there a way to get a cleaning service done at the dealershit? like an engine power flush or something that gets the grime out so it runs more efficiently?
08-27-2005, 01:13 AM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not gonna get into another discussion with you Redz, but when people will search forums or post something about AIRRAM, I will make sure to refef them to the dyno results that proven that it doesn't work. Well, maybe it does but still not worth $500-600, IMO.
You can't say that I'm wrong because there is not one car on which dyno was done properly with the AIRRAM. Once I see claimed 15whp on a beta, I will say that you are the man and AIRRAM is the shit, but for now you are wrong buddy.
I guess, I did start arguing with you again. Damn it.
Anyways, I'd really love to see our cars have 160whp with all the bolt ons, but nothing yet 02.gif
HKC, your problem is 100k mi on a 4 cyl engine...
You can't say that I'm wrong because there is not one car on which dyno was done properly with the AIRRAM. Once I see claimed 15whp on a beta, I will say that you are the man and AIRRAM is the shit, but for now you are wrong buddy.
I guess, I did start arguing with you again. Damn it.
Anyways, I'd really love to see our cars have 160whp with all the bolt ons, but nothing yet 02.gif
HKC, your problem is 100k mi on a 4 cyl engine...