RANDOM I AM PERFECT NOW!!!!
#11
Guessing there are four injectors stock, he added two = 6... And to add two more, you'd need an alternate ECU to run them (MFI fuel controller, like what Alpine provides with their kits)
Turboman, you have indeed done a good job. A 2.0L motor on better pistons and 0.9bar makes sense building 250+ horsepower. Now just don't break your transmission!
Congrats on the buildup, I've still got quite a few more months ahead before mine is fully ready to tackle serious boost smile.gif
-Red-
Turboman, you have indeed done a good job. A 2.0L motor on better pistons and 0.9bar makes sense building 250+ horsepower. Now just don't break your transmission!
Congrats on the buildup, I've still got quite a few more months ahead before mine is fully ready to tackle serious boost smile.gif
-Red-
#13
that is some great HP...but only 6.7 sec 0-60??? I don't want to be a party pooper but that doesn't come close to a Subaru WRX...it only takes it 5.8 sec to get to 60 with only 225 hp. Maybe you just need to practice a little to get a better time. 6.7 sec is what an RSX-S is doing. You can do better...
Matt
Matt
#15
Kidd is right, the WRX has twice the amount of traction (at minimum) than our cars do, and as such can get VERY fast launches. I've seen a person in an almost-stock WRX get 1.7 second 60 foot times on stock tires and stock clutch; doing a 1.7 second 60 foot time in a front wheel drive ALWAYS requires slicks, almost always requires suspension and clutch work, and usually also requires more horsepower.
As for how much the motor cost, I'm kinda curious too. I have solid numbers on what MINE cost, but I have no solid power numbers nor will I for quite some time.
-Red-
As for how much the motor cost, I'm kinda curious too. I have solid numbers on what MINE cost, but I have no solid power numbers nor will I for quite some time.
-Red-