RANDOM I AM PERFECT NOW!!!!
Guessing there are four injectors stock, he added two = 6... And to add two more, you'd need an alternate ECU to run them (MFI fuel controller, like what Alpine provides with their kits)
Turboman, you have indeed done a good job. A 2.0L motor on better pistons and 0.9bar makes sense building 250+ horsepower. Now just don't break your transmission!
Congrats on the buildup, I've still got quite a few more months ahead before mine is fully ready to tackle serious boost smile.gif
-Red-
Turboman, you have indeed done a good job. A 2.0L motor on better pistons and 0.9bar makes sense building 250+ horsepower. Now just don't break your transmission!

Congrats on the buildup, I've still got quite a few more months ahead before mine is fully ready to tackle serious boost smile.gif
-Red-
that is some great HP...but only 6.7 sec 0-60??? I don't want to be a party pooper but that doesn't come close to a Subaru WRX...it only takes it 5.8 sec to get to 60 with only 225 hp. Maybe you just need to practice a little to get a better time. 6.7 sec is what an RSX-S is doing. You can do better...
Matt
Matt
Kidd is right, the WRX has twice the amount of traction (at minimum) than our cars do, and as such can get VERY fast launches. I've seen a person in an almost-stock WRX get 1.7 second 60 foot times on stock tires and stock clutch; doing a 1.7 second 60 foot time in a front wheel drive ALWAYS requires slicks, almost always requires suspension and clutch work, and usually also requires more horsepower.
As for how much the motor cost, I'm kinda curious too. I have solid numbers on what MINE cost, but I have no solid power numbers nor will I for quite some time.
-Red-
As for how much the motor cost, I'm kinda curious too. I have solid numbers on what MINE cost, but I have no solid power numbers nor will I for quite some time.
-Red-



