Turbo & Supercharge (Forced Induction) Posts regarding Turbochargers, Superchargers and any other method for Forced Induction.

Turbos everywhere

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 25, 2012 | 11:47 AM
  #1  
needforspeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Vehicle: 00 Tiburon
Default Turbos everywhere

Have you guys noticed that almost ever car manufacture is coming out with turbos now in their vehicles. I think in 5-10 years, almost every car will have some type of forced induction on it. You can make more power with a turbo, on a smaller engine, and still get great fuel economy.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2012 | 01:21 PM
  #2  
bmxer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Vehicle: 2006 Kia Spectra5
Default

Wait till they start making turbo diesels with three times the torque as a gas engine ... we're all going to be driving smokers :-)
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2012 | 01:57 PM
  #3  
HyundaiKitCoupe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,992
Likes: 0
From: Washington D.C.
Vehicle: Hyundai Tiburon FX
Default

They're going to be integrated into the "green" movement. I predict just about every hybrid will have them in the next decade.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2012 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
wheel_of_steel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 0
From: Floating around the AUDM
Vehicle: X3 Sprint, S-Coupe Turbo
Default

A smaller engine with a turbocharger will have operating in a region of lower brake-specific fuel consumption than its NA equivalent.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2012 | 06:35 AM
  #5  
03tibe85's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Vehicle: 2003/Hyundai/Tiburon
Default

That's what the OE's want you to believe^^. Bottom line is power is power. whether its a 2.0L Turbocharged engine making 300bhp or a 3.0L N/A V6 making 300bhp they are going to use about the same amount of fuel at peak power. Oftentimes the turbo engine will require more fuel due to the increased combustion temps. About the only time you will see greater efficiency in the smaller engine is when its off boost and how many times is that gonna happen? lol
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2012 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
yellow01's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: PA/MD
Vehicle: 01 tib t3t4
Default

^ you drive in off boost like 95% of the time unless you want to ram the car in front of you

Id rather have the 300hp v6 with the deisel truck turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2012 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
wheel_of_steel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 0
From: Floating around the AUDM
Vehicle: X3 Sprint, S-Coupe Turbo
Default

What yellow01 said.



Apart from during a drag race, you have far less frictional and pumping losses, and greater VE to boot. The smaller engine tends to require larger throttle openings, which can be done electronically without the driver knowing. Not only that, but you are actually recapturing exhaust energy and putting it to work, instead of just making noise and heat.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2012 | 08:36 PM
  #8  
XGODZX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Western Australia
Vehicle: 1999 Elantra GLS Sportswagon
Default

Ford Australia has just released a 2.0l turbo four-cylinder engine in our Falcon they call EcoBoost in what is traditionally been renowned for both six-cylinder and V8 engines ? I wonder if the weight factor will be an issue.



http://www.caradvice.com.au/169852/f...ace-local-six/
Reply




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 PM.