Bought A Turbo.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 1998/Hyundai/Tiburon FX
Hello everyone,
I just bought a turbo today.
It was supposedly a t/3 t/4 turbonetics.
But when I got home and started researching, the turbine side is definately a T4 (there is a 3" outlet and the outlet flange is without a doubt a turbonetics t4). The A/R on the turbine is .58 and it is 'stage 5'.
The compressor is a 57 trim, I'm guessing .63 a/r but am not sure. There is a 3" inlet.
Is this too big for my 2.0L rd with an airram, 65mm tb, 268 cams and headwork?
It doesnt make any sense to put a t4 turbine housing on a t3 compressor unless you have a large engine trying to run low boost right? Supposedly it was on an IS300 6 cyl. and flows a maximum of 500 crank hp. There is minimal run time on this and shaft play is less than .5mm.
I will post up some pics if I can.
If anyone could let me know if this will work on the tib at 20-25 lbs. that would be great. And when it might spool, it is not ball bearing.
Thanks.
I just bought a turbo today.
It was supposedly a t/3 t/4 turbonetics.
But when I got home and started researching, the turbine side is definately a T4 (there is a 3" outlet and the outlet flange is without a doubt a turbonetics t4). The A/R on the turbine is .58 and it is 'stage 5'.
The compressor is a 57 trim, I'm guessing .63 a/r but am not sure. There is a 3" inlet.
Is this too big for my 2.0L rd with an airram, 65mm tb, 268 cams and headwork?
It doesnt make any sense to put a t4 turbine housing on a t3 compressor unless you have a large engine trying to run low boost right? Supposedly it was on an IS300 6 cyl. and flows a maximum of 500 crank hp. There is minimal run time on this and shaft play is less than .5mm.
I will post up some pics if I can.
If anyone could let me know if this will work on the tib at 20-25 lbs. that would be great. And when it might spool, it is not ball bearing.
Thanks.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2002 Hyundai Elantra
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Hyundai Tiburon
dunno if this will help or not but assuming you have the 2.0L engine if you want to run 25psi you're going to need a turbo that produces between 530 and 575 cfm or 43 and 46 lb/min (6500rpm)
These are just rough estimates*
if you can find a compressor map for that turbo plug those in with PR=2.7 that will give you your efficiency at max boost at redline
These are just rough estimates*
if you can find a compressor map for that turbo plug those in with PR=2.7 that will give you your efficiency at max boost at redline
#5
theres a good chunk of people on here using t3/t4 turbos, so its no where near overkill. i have a t3/t4 50 trim turbo on my car, and it spools pretty well, not sure on the ~rpm though.
for that high of boost that you are wanting to push, that turbo should work really good.
if you were looking to push like 12-16lbs of boost, you may want a smaller t3/t4 because it would spool faster.
that A/R on the turbine is a lil bigger than normal i believe, i think mine is a .48.
if those are the compressor specs, it looks like it should be flowing arounf 50lb/min with a lil more top end than a regular t3/t4 57trim.
for that high of boost that you are wanting to push, that turbo should work really good.
if you were looking to push like 12-16lbs of boost, you may want a smaller t3/t4 because it would spool faster.
that A/R on the turbine is a lil bigger than normal i believe, i think mine is a .48.
if those are the compressor specs, it looks like it should be flowing arounf 50lb/min with a lil more top end than a regular t3/t4 57trim.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 1998/Hyundai/Tiburon FX
Hello guys,
Thanks for the responses firstly.
Cypher, that is not my turbo, I have a turbonetics, not a garrett. Although the compressor housing is similar.
I believe i have a straight t4 turbo, I can't find any turbonetics t3/t4's with the specs of this turbo.
You guys are right about the lb/min flow rates, I think it is somewhere in the 45-50 range.
Would the cams and headwork that I have increase my flow capability?
At 20 psi, when would this monster spool? 4000? What about 25psi? It shouldn't change right?
Thanks.
Thanks for the responses firstly.
Cypher, that is not my turbo, I have a turbonetics, not a garrett. Although the compressor housing is similar.
I believe i have a straight t4 turbo, I can't find any turbonetics t3/t4's with the specs of this turbo.
You guys are right about the lb/min flow rates, I think it is somewhere in the 45-50 range.
Would the cams and headwork that I have increase my flow capability?
At 20 psi, when would this monster spool? 4000? What about 25psi? It shouldn't change right?
Thanks.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 1998/Hyundai/Tiburon FX
Here are the pics as promised:
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics005.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics004.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics003.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics002.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics001.jpg
I was told this is virtually a brand new turbo, there is about .5mm of shaft play, but since it is non-ball bearing I was told there has to be oil around the shaft to reduce that. That isn't excessive is it?
Any thoughts?
Thanks guys.
Bump for some info.
Thanks!
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics005.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics004.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics003.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics002.jpg
http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k29/tdon...bonetics001.jpg
I was told this is virtually a brand new turbo, there is about .5mm of shaft play, but since it is non-ball bearing I was told there has to be oil around the shaft to reduce that. That isn't excessive is it?
Any thoughts?
Thanks guys.
Bump for some info.
Thanks!