Any 400+ horsepower cars driving around?
I do miss my 400whp 2.0L GK Tib some days...not taking a hard corner at the track and it wanting to push me in the weeds as boost hits though.. 
At least my built block lives on in TibbyTib's ride, now if we can just get his sh1t tuned that would be AWESOME in the lighter RD body.
I've got a GK V6 now and about to slap on a MP62 Supercharger kit running E85. Won't get me near 400whp but I should be over 250whp....and it won't want to kill me everytime boost hits.. lol

At least my built block lives on in TibbyTib's ride, now if we can just get his sh1t tuned that would be AWESOME in the lighter RD body.
I've got a GK V6 now and about to slap on a MP62 Supercharger kit running E85. Won't get me near 400whp but I should be over 250whp....and it won't want to kill me everytime boost hits.. lol
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 711
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico//Atlanta, GA
Vehicle: 1997 Beta Swapped Accent
Reviving this old post because I did not notice it had a replay...
I just moved to the US (six months ago) and I notice that for the most part we have better fuel then here. I have a 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS manual transmission that I shipped from the island. As soon as I got it and field the tank with Shell 93 I got a CEL. When I scanned it it was saying system too lean. After doing the research I figgered out that our fuel has less Ethanol then here. Our 93 has no ethanol.
I think that why we can go a little leaner.
I just moved to the US (six months ago) and I notice that for the most part we have better fuel then here. I have a 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS manual transmission that I shipped from the island. As soon as I got it and field the tank with Shell 93 I got a CEL. When I scanned it it was saying system too lean. After doing the research I figgered out that our fuel has less Ethanol then here. Our 93 has no ethanol.
I think that why we can go a little leaner.




