Photography, TV, Music, Art, & Culture This is an area to discuss anything that has to do with Arts & Cultural items, such as Photography, Paintings, History, Movies, Television, Music, Fashion, etc.

Jurassic Park 4 won't have feathered dinosaurs

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-26-2013, 12:13 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Elantra66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Elantra
Default Jurassic Park 4 won't have feathered dinosaurs

Colin Trevorrow has revealed that Jurassic Park 4 wont be historically accurate in at least one way: there wont be any feathered dinosaurs in his movie. The Safety Not Guaranteed director took to Twitter to set the record straight about the recent scientific development.



No feathers. #JP4, he tweeted.



Trevorrow was only announced as director of the upcoming Universal Pictures movie earlier this month. This will be the first installment in the Jurassic Park franchise since 2001s Jurassic Park III, which means its the first movie in the series with the knowledge that dinosaurs actually used to have feathers.



http://www.ifc.com/fix/2013/03/juras...-says-director


Disappointing, but it's not like Jurassic Park was ever about scientific accuracy.
Old 03-26-2013, 12:16 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
turbosocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 hyundai tiburon
Default

ill take the typical badass JP raptor over a feathered, sissy lookin' thing!
Old 03-26-2013, 02:09 PM
  #3  
Administrator
 
187sks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Vehicle: Two Accents, Mini, Miata, Van, Outback, and a ZX-6
Default

I've seen some terrifying feathered renditions.



Besides, Velociraptors were the size of turkeys. The old movie Velociraptors were a lot closer to what the Utahraptor actually looked like.
Old 03-26-2013, 09:33 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 10,795
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
Default

So . . . we're debating the scientific accuracy of a comic book on the big screen?



.



.



.



Old 04-06-2013, 03:56 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Antonyr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: England
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: Hyundai Accent
Default

i dont get all this bullshit...



we cant even date anything over 1950.



Because carbon dating cant be used because of all nuclear testing.
Old 04-11-2013, 12:34 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
187sks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Vehicle: Two Accents, Mini, Miata, Van, Outback, and a ZX-6
Default

^^^That is a scientifically inaccurate statement. Nuclear testing has nothing to do with current isotopic ratios inside of the vast majority of samples.
Old 04-11-2013, 01:15 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
HyundaiKitCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 11,992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: Hyundai Tiburon FX
Default

It appears that Floyderaptor is correct.









It says the film however used Deinonychus, which at the time was referred as "Velociraptor antirrhopus". The problem is it also had feathers.







I just don't know about this whole feather ordeal. All my life I've been lead to believe that these were reptilian-looking.
Old 04-11-2013, 01:53 PM
  #8  
Administrator
 
187sks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Vehicle: Two Accents, Mini, Miata, Van, Outback, and a ZX-6
Default

Behold the Utahraptor. Never sleep well again.







All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.