I wonder if my state will appeal this
http://consumerist.com/2011/08/feder...itutional.html
to that court!
A federal appeals court ruled that the people have the right to record police officers when they're on the job in public. A U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals judge found that a Massachusetts law used to ban such actions is unconstitutional.
Universal Hub reports the case involved a Boston lawyer who was arrested and had his phone seized when he recorded a drug arrest. In the ruling (PDF), the judge wrote "Gathering information about government officials in a form that can readily be disseminated to others serves a cardinal First Amendment interest in protecting and promoting "the free discussion of governmental affairs."
The judge noted that because the recording took place in a public park, the officers weren't able to claim immunity to the protections.
Universal Hub reports the case involved a Boston lawyer who was arrested and had his phone seized when he recorded a drug arrest. In the ruling (PDF), the judge wrote "Gathering information about government officials in a form that can readily be disseminated to others serves a cardinal First Amendment interest in protecting and promoting "the free discussion of governmental affairs."
The judge noted that because the recording took place in a public park, the officers weren't able to claim immunity to the protections.
Hopefully this can apply to that video posted the other week where an officer arrested a guy and took 2 phones because they were filming a government official of some sort in a public place.





