Can we cut the crap with all these redundant sexual classifications already?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,185
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Vehicle: MC + RD2 + AW11 + 944 = 4x Win
Can we cut the crap with all these redundant sexual classifications already?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...59970857833095
Why does ever special snowflake need a goddamned unique classification for their bullshit feelings? Love who you love, f*ck who you f*ck. Stop wearing your sexuality like a badge of honor.
Pansexual? No you're a slut with slightly lower standards.
Graysexual? No, you're just a confused adolescent.
Demisexual? NO! It's normal to be attracted to someone you spend all day with.
Lithromantic? No, Masochist.
Polysexual? The f*ck does that even mean?! How is this not already covered by Pansexual or some other lame label?
Skoliosexual? You probably ate paint chips as a child and your parents are related by blood.
Asexual? No! No!! No, no, no, no NO! f*ck you. You cannot self replicate. Science says you're an idiot.
This rant brought to you fatigue and sweet sweet tequila.
Why does ever special snowflake need a goddamned unique classification for their bullshit feelings? Love who you love, f*ck who you f*ck. Stop wearing your sexuality like a badge of honor.
Pansexual? No you're a slut with slightly lower standards.
Graysexual? No, you're just a confused adolescent.
Demisexual? NO! It's normal to be attracted to someone you spend all day with.
Lithromantic? No, Masochist.
Polysexual? The f*ck does that even mean?! How is this not already covered by Pansexual or some other lame label?
Skoliosexual? You probably ate paint chips as a child and your parents are related by blood.
Asexual? No! No!! No, no, no, no NO! f*ck you. You cannot self replicate. Science says you're an idiot.
This rant brought to you fatigue and sweet sweet tequila.
