13 states adding yearly fees on electric vehicles.
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Compton,Ca.
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2011 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Base
13 states adding yearly fees on electric vehicles.
A growing number of states are imposing new fees on electric vehicles as officials scrounge for ways to pay for infrastructure projects they say are long overdue. At least five states, including California, passed bills targeting the cars this year, bringing the total number with fees on the books to 13. The charges generally range from $100 to $200 a year.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/marke...ob-tw-enus-702
Idiots still think the power to charge their cars comes from fairy dust too.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/marke...ob-tw-enus-702
Idiots still think the power to charge their cars comes from fairy dust too.
#3
Super Moderator
They're not much better, if at all, once you account for the pollution at the factory and the power plant, where the batteries are produced and recharged - the problem is electric cars aren't paying gasoline taxes, which hurts state budgets. The argument is: If everyone uses petroleum fuels, then taxing petroleum fuels is the next closest thing to tolled roads, to charge road users for the upkeep of the roads. If they aren't using petroleum fuels but still using the road, they are skipping out on their "share" of the upkeep.
#4
Administrator
Volvo will only make electric and hybrid cars starting in 2019
https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/05/vo...rting-in-2019/
https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/05/vo...rting-in-2019/
Volvo is done with entirely traditional engines and exclusively gas-powered vehicles, the company announced. By 2019, Volvo group intends to offer only either fully electric or hybrid engines on all new models, making it the first automaker to commit to using only alternative drive trains.
The end of the solely combustion engine-powered car did seem like an eventual inevitability, given the advantages of electric and hybrid from a manufacturing and performance standpoint, and given the industry’s heavy investment in autonomous vehicle tech. But for Volvo to commit to going entirely hybrid and electric just two years from now is still the strongest sign yet we’ve seen that the purely combustion engine’s days might be numbered sooner, rather than later.
Volvo already had a target sales figure of 1 million electric and hybrid cars by 2025, and now that target seems well within reach given it’s all it’ll be selling in terms of new vehicles. Volvo also announced it would launch five new electric and hybrid cars between 2019 and 2021, and that two of those will be made by Polestar, which the company recently announced would become its own subsidiary and brand selling performance EVs, likely to compete with high-end Tesla models.
Part of the cost benefit of making electric cars is dealing with ever stronger emissions requirements on vehicles, which are set to tighten in most key international markets, including China, which is where Volvo’s owner Geely is based. Production costs of EV parts and batteries are also getting smaller, as capacity and manufacturing processes improve.
Volvo getting a jump on the move to electric, with hybrids included as a transitional stopgap, is a smart and aggressive play for claiming a leadership position in the market of the future. A lot of companies talk about their work with, and commitment to alternative drivetrains, but this is really putting your money where you mouth is.
The end of the solely combustion engine-powered car did seem like an eventual inevitability, given the advantages of electric and hybrid from a manufacturing and performance standpoint, and given the industry’s heavy investment in autonomous vehicle tech. But for Volvo to commit to going entirely hybrid and electric just two years from now is still the strongest sign yet we’ve seen that the purely combustion engine’s days might be numbered sooner, rather than later.
Volvo already had a target sales figure of 1 million electric and hybrid cars by 2025, and now that target seems well within reach given it’s all it’ll be selling in terms of new vehicles. Volvo also announced it would launch five new electric and hybrid cars between 2019 and 2021, and that two of those will be made by Polestar, which the company recently announced would become its own subsidiary and brand selling performance EVs, likely to compete with high-end Tesla models.
Part of the cost benefit of making electric cars is dealing with ever stronger emissions requirements on vehicles, which are set to tighten in most key international markets, including China, which is where Volvo’s owner Geely is based. Production costs of EV parts and batteries are also getting smaller, as capacity and manufacturing processes improve.
Volvo getting a jump on the move to electric, with hybrids included as a transitional stopgap, is a smart and aggressive play for claiming a leadership position in the market of the future. A lot of companies talk about their work with, and commitment to alternative drivetrains, but this is really putting your money where you mouth is.
#5
Super Moderator
Originally Posted by Stocker' timestamp='1499355118' post='7y76y16717
They're not much better, if at all, once you account for the pollution at the factory and the power plant, where the batteries are produced and recharged - the problem is electric cars aren't paying gasoline taxes, which hurts state budgets. The argument is: If everyone uses petroleum fuels, then taxing petroleum fuels is the next closest thing to tolled roads, to charge road users for the upkeep of the roads. If they aren't using petroleum fuels but still using the road, they are skipping out on their "share" of the upkeep.
I have no problem with the fee if it's based on math... avg miles driven / fuel mileage rating (eMPG) x taxes per gallon. I was simply stating the fact that the articles that came out a few years ago about the battery mines, and production emissions have all been debunked. The figures in those articles all came from one study paid for by a petro lobbying firm and were overestimated.