With deepest sympathy....
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,533
Likes: 0
From: tacos
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
independent test. I'm sure it was the 3.7L in the G37 vs. the 3.8L in the Genesis.
Still, even if it was the Top of the Line Genesis ($34k?) vs. the Base model G37 ($41k?) it's still a viable test. Would you prefer they used the "Sport" G37 @ $45k with bigger wheels and brakes, or the AWD version of the G37 @ $42k? Which would be a better test to compare? Same engine. Still a big price difference.
Still, even if it was the Top of the Line Genesis ($34k?) vs. the Base model G37 ($41k?) it's still a viable test. Would you prefer they used the "Sport" G37 @ $45k with bigger wheels and brakes, or the AWD version of the G37 @ $42k? Which would be a better test to compare? Same engine. Still a big price difference.
how about we do a ss camaro(msrp of $32k) vs the top of the line genesis? i mean the gc is more expensive it should be faster right?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,533
Likes: 0
From: tacos
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
you know that was sarcasm right? the base v6 is like 29k
my point is when you setup a study like this but ignore the variables you can set up what ever outcome you want
as i said before if we are only concidering engine size why not put the base gc vs a evo? i mean they are both 4 cyl turbos the test should be fair right?
how about we do a offroad test between the gc and a v6 f150?
my point is when you setup a study like this but ignore the variables you can set up what ever outcome you want
as i said before if we are only concidering engine size why not put the base gc vs a evo? i mean they are both 4 cyl turbos the test should be fair right?
how about we do a offroad test between the gc and a v6 f150?
