Hyundai Genesis Forum The Hyundai Genesis Forum. An area for the all new generation RWD Hyundai sports coupe and sedan.

2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec Full Test

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 10:32 AM
  #1  
Visionz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 23,226
Likes: 9
From: Upstate NY
Vehicle: 2010 Genesis 2.0T
Default 2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec Full Test





After ripping off more than a few heel-and-toe downshifts on Glendora Mountain Road (GMR), we arrive at our test track, where the 2013 Hyundai Genesis 3.8 R-Spec hits 60 mph in 5.3 seconds (or 5.0 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip) and completes the quarter-mile in 13.6 seconds at 104.1 mph.



Compare that to the last 3.8 R-Spec Coupe we tested, which ran a 5.9-second 0-60 (5.6 seconds with rollout) and a 14.3-second quarter-mile at 98.0 mph and cost $2 grand less.



Our 3.8 Genesis Coupe is also quicker than the V6 Mustang, which does zero to 60 in 5.6 seconds on its way to a 13.9-second quarter-mile at 101.2 mph, as well as the G37 coupe (5.7 seconds zero to 60, 13.9-second quarter-mile at 101.4 mph) and the IPL G coupe (5.8 seconds zero to 60, 14.0-second quarter-mile at 102.1 mph). And it's right in line with our long-term 370Z (5.3 seconds zero to 60, 13.6-second quarter-mile at 103.2 mph) and the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec sedan (5.3 seconds to 60, 13.5 at 105.2 mph).


A $2,000 price increase is no small thing in this price range, but the 2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec is certainly the best Genesis Coupe to date. It's quick, it sounds wonderful, it handles well, it's comfortable enough to drive every day, and in time we'll get used to the fake hood vents (maybe).



However, there's no denying that we could get into a V6-equipped Mustang or Camaro for less money. Their engines aren't nearly as potent or sweet-sounding, but if you just want a rear-drive coupe with respectable acceleration, they'll fill the bill.



On the flip side, a couple grand more would get us into a much quicker Mustang GT or a more focused 370Z.



You have to want the Genesis Coupe on its own merits this time around — not for its rock-bottom price tag. And while we could easily see ourselves going out one day and buying a 2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec, the next day we might wish we'd spent the extra dough on a 5.0 Mustang.


http://www.insideline.com/hyundai/ge...full-test.html
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 11:09 AM
  #2  
Throwdown's Avatar
http://www.hyundaiaftermarket.org/images/vendor1.png
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Vehicle: 04 Tiburon GT
Default

Good read!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 11:59 AM
  #3  
HyundaiKitCoupe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,992
Likes: 0
From: Washington D.C.
Vehicle: Hyundai Tiburon FX
Default

It's not the best review I've ever read.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 12:04 AM
  #4  
PandaSmuggler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Vehicle: 2011 Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec
Default

On the flip side, a couple grand more would get us into a much quicker Mustang GT or a more focused 370Z.


Doesn't a Mustang 5.0 start at $29,710?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 08:48 AM
  #5  
Stocker's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,795
Likes: 5
From: Pflugerville, TX
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
Default

Is anyone else occasionally surprised to note that these used to be supercar specifications and now they're daily driver specifications?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 10:13 AM
  #6  
187sks's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 2
From: Lacey, WA
Vehicle: Two Accents, Mini, Miata, Van, Outback, and a ZX-6
Default

I know. We are living in a heyday of performance cars. It is being threatened by the ever increasing CAFE standards, but when the Veloster turbo is pretty awesome, and also gets 38mpg, it might be a while before they choke the fun out of all the cars.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 10:27 AM
  #7  
HyundaiKitCoupe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,992
Likes: 0
From: Washington D.C.
Vehicle: Hyundai Tiburon FX
Default

Is anyone else occasionally surprised to note that these used to be supercar specifications and now they're daily driver specifications?


by output it's stunning, but by weight/layout it's not. 90's supercars were mid-engined, fiberglass panels, carbon fiber chassis. they weighed around the same as an RD1, some less. also the materials for supercars are some of the strongest and lightest, inspired by Formula 1 cars, which combine a high output with featherweight performance. they're still on top for me.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 03:21 PM
  #8  
PandaSmuggler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Vehicle: 2011 Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec
Default

Originally Posted by Stocker
Is anyone else occasionally surprised to note that these used to be supercar specifications and now they're daily driver specifications?


I'm pretty surprised that even as cars are getting bulkier in weight, they're still able to get great 0-60 times and get even better mileage.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 04:13 PM
  #9  
WytchDctr's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Vehicle: 14 EGT 2.0
Default

To bad its buttugly from the pics I have seen.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2012 | 04:31 PM
  #10  
PandaSmuggler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Vehicle: 2011 Genesis Coupe 3.8 R-Spec
Default

Originally Posted by WytchDctr
To bad its buttugly from the pics I have seen.


Agreed. I was worried that I would feel bad for not waiting, and when I saw the performance numbers I felt bad. Then I saw the looks and the price and now I don't feel so bad
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 AM.