USA being sued by five hospitals over privatized Medicare audits
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2002 Elantra GT
USA being sued by five hospitals over privatized Medicare audits
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is being sued by the American Hospital Association (AHA), claiming that HHS incentivizes Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) to deny Medicare funding to hospitals for treatments already performed. RACs are private contractors that assess over- and underpayments in Medicare reimbursements. AHA alleges that because RACs are paid on contingency, they have a vested interest to deny funding.
FREE MARKET FAILS AGAIN
The RACs are frequently wrong in their assertions about what a physician, confronted with a patient in need of medical treatment, should have done months or years earlier. Indeed, hospitals report that when they pursue appeals through the administrative appeals process—an expensive and burdensome exercise—they are successful in overturning RAC denials 75 percent of the time. Despite this alarming error rate, when a RAC determines that a provider was paid for inpatient hospital services but that the patient in question should have been treated as an outpatient, CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] takes back the entire Part A payment. Moreover, CMS takes the position that once an inpatient claim that was paid under Medicare Part A is later—usually years later—denied, the hospital cannot receive Medicare Part B payment except for a few ancillary services. As a result, when a RAC concludes that a hospital should have provided items and services on an outpatient, rather than an inpatient, basis, the hospital ends up receiving little if any reimbursement for reasonable and medically necessary items and services provided. The RACs fare significantly better. They keep a contingency percentage—9 percent to 12.5 percent—of the entire Part A payment.
Source: aha.org (PDF)
Source: aha.org (PDF)
FREE MARKET FAILS AGAIN
#3
Super Moderator
HOW THE f*ck IS THIS FREE MARKET? The government takes your money and tells you where you can get service that they will reimburse with your money, then the government tells this other company "go see how many payments you can deny after the work is done" and you call that a failure of the free market? That, lads, is a fine illustration of why the government has no business doing anything with health, health care, or health care payment insurance!
Free market would be: you go to a doctor and get stuff done, then pay them (or have an insurance company pay them). If you are old and sick, it costs more because you need more work done. If you think the price is too high, you go somewhere else.
Free market would be: you go to a doctor and get stuff done, then pay them (or have an insurance company pay them). If you are old and sick, it costs more because you need more work done. If you think the price is too high, you go somewhere else.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: tacos
Posts: 9,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
#9
Super Moderator
Very many someones in various State and Federal government agencies have decided (and gone so far as to officially publish guidelines) that veterans - and especially ones just back from the sandbox - deserve extra scrutiny because they coult be terrorists.