Computers, Gaming, & Technology Here you can talk about anything with circuit boards, or dilithium crystals, or flux capacitors. Show off your technology, computing, and gaming knowledge.

This is gonna get alot of people heated

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-29-2011, 07:13 AM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Visionz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 23,223
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Vehicle: 2010 Genesis 2.0T
Default This is gonna get alot of people heated

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6237364/.../#.TvxShDVv-Ai



FDA approves computer chip for humans







WASHINGTON — Medical milestone or privacy invasion? A tiny computer chip approved Wednesday for implantation in a patient’s arm can speed vital information about a patient’s medical history to doctors and hospitals. But critics warn that it could open new ways to imperil the confidentiality of medical records.



The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach, Fla., could market the VeriChip, an implantable computer chip about the size of a grain of rice, for medical purposes.



With the pinch of a syringe, the microchip is inserted under the skin in a procedure that takes less than 20 minutes and leaves no stitches. Silently and invisibly, the dormant chip stores a code that releases patient-specific information when a scanner passes over it.



Think UPC code. The identifier, emblazoned on a food item, brings up its name and price on the cashier’s screen.



Chip's dual uses raise alarm

The VeriChip itself contains no medical records, just codes that can be scanned, and revealed, in a doctor’s office or hospital. With that code, the health providers can unlock that portion of a secure database that holds that person’s medical information, including allergies and prior treatment. The electronic database, not the chip, would be updated with each medical visit.



The microchips have already been implanted in 1 million pets. But the chip’s possible dual use for tracking people’s movements — as well as speeding delivery of their medical information to emergency rooms — has raised alarm.



“If privacy protections aren’t built in at the outset, there could be harmful consequences for patients,” said Emily Stewart, a policy analyst at the Health Privacy Project.



To protect patient privacy, the devices should reveal only vital medical information, like blood type and allergic reactions, needed for health care workers to do their jobs, Stewart said.



An information technology guru at Detroit Medical Center, however, sees the benefits of the devices and will lobby for his center’s inclusion in a VeriChip pilot program.



“One of the big problems in health care has been the medical records situation. So much of it is still on paper,” said David Ellis, the center’s chief futurist and co-founder of the Michigan Electronic Medical Records Initiative.



'Part of the future of medicine'

As “medically mobile” patients visit specialists for care, their records fragment on computer systems that don’t talk to each other.



“It’s part of the future of medicine to have these kinds of technologies that make life simpler for the patient,” Ellis said. Pushing for the strongest encryption algorithms to ensure hackers can’t nab medical data as information transfers from chip to reader to secure database, will help address privacy concerns, he said.



The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday announced $139 million in grants to help make real President Bush’s push for electronic health records for most Americans within a decade.



William A. Pierce, an HHS spokesman, could not say whether VeriChip and its accompanying secure database of medical records fit within that initiative.



“Exactly what those technologies are is still to be sorted out,” Pierce said. “It all has to respect and comport with the privacy rules.”



Applied Digital gave away scanners to a few hundred animal shelters and veterinary clinics when it first entered the pet market 15 years ago. Now, 50,000 such scanners have been sold.



To kickstart the chip’s use among humans, Applied Digital will provide $650 scanners for free at 200 of the nation’s trauma centers.



Implantation costs $150 to $200

In pets, installing the chip runs about $50. For humans, the chip implantation cost would be $150 to $200, said Angela Fulcher, an Applied Digital spokeswoman.



Fulcher could not say whether the cost of data storage and encrypted transmission of medical information would be passed to providers.



Because the VeriChip is invisible, it’s also unclear how health care workers would know which unconscious patients to scan. Company officials say if the chip use becomes routine, scanning triceps for hidden chips would become second nature at hospitals.



Ultimately, the company hopes patients who suffer from such ailments as diabetes and Alzheimer’s or who undergo complex treatments, like chemotherapy, would have chips implanted. If the procedure proves as popular for use in humans as in pets, that could mean up to 1 million chips implanted in people. So far, just 1,000 people across the globe have had the devices implanted, very few of them in the United States.



The company’s chief executive officer, Scott R. Silverman, is one of a half dozen executives who had chips implanted. Silverman said chips implanted for medical uses could also be used for security purposes, like tracking employee movement through nuclear power plants.



Such security uses are rare in the United States.



Meanwhile, the chip has been used for pure whimsy: Club hoppers in Barcelona, Spain, now use the microchip to enter a VIP area and, through links to a different database, speed payment much like a smartcard.


Cliffs: The Food and Drug Administration approved an implantable computer chip that can pass a patient’s medical details to doctors, speeding care. Conspiracy theorists and Big Brother Watch groups will flip out all over the world!
Old 12-29-2011, 07:31 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
wheel_of_steel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Floating around the AUDM
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: X3 Sprint, S-Coupe Turbo
Default

Yeah nah. Medic alert bracelets should do the same job without the skynet.
Old 12-29-2011, 11:10 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Blue Bomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2004 Tuscani Tiburon
Default

I think its a good idea for those people that are in the hospital regularily and can have these situations where this is necessary, but for the average person like me who is essentially never in the hospital, I would never bother.
Old 12-29-2011, 08:44 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 10,795
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
Default

The medic alert bracelets and necklaces already do the same thing. This is a solution in search of a problem. Note their lack of optimism: 1M people is 0.3% of the population, statistically nobody.
Old 12-29-2011, 10:16 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Turboron_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kent, Wa
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 13 Gen Coupe Ult.
Default

Medical alert bracelets do more than just inform the doctors. Medical Alert Bracelets let every day people know what a person may or may not have, or if they are like my Mother and have seizures often.



They are very useful to use, Especially if they are in jepordy of there life and cant talk, then you can look at the bracelet and have a few clues of what to do!
Old 12-30-2011, 06:34 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
HotBlue02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Vehicle: 02 Hyundai Accent
Default

Back to the chip... sure it will only be used for medical support? Listen to this,

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq7kBhts9a8&feature=related[/media]
Old 01-02-2012, 09:16 AM
  #7  
DTN
Moderator
 
DTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leesville, Louisiana
Posts: 11,731
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

The problem with RFID is that it is fully reproducable. You can make a RFID reader/transmitter for $40. If you're using RFID for your money, all it takes is for someone to swipe your RFID information from your wallet.. By swipe, I mean, pass a reader across your back pocket... Then use it to make a purchase.
Old 01-02-2012, 09:37 AM
  #8  
Administrator
 
majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɯooɹpǝq ɹnoʎ
Posts: 13,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: ǝdnoɔ sısǝuǝƃ
Default

RFID has no legitimate security. I refuse to use NFC phones and encourage anyone else NOT to use any RFID that holds or transmits any financial or personally identifiable information.



It's just scary.



RFID is awesome, but until it can be secure I'm not going near it with any of my devices or financial information. Sure, I have 3 RFID cards in my wallet, but they're strictly for door access.
Old 01-02-2012, 08:02 PM
  #9  
Super Moderator
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 10,795
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
Default

This is one of the things where Clark Howard gets a HUGE



He keeps saying on his show how our credit card system is all outdated & whatnot and praises Europeans' wisdom for going to their fancy wireless cards. YGTBKM. Every time I get a renewed credit card, I specifically demand withOUT the wireless/smart whatever for security purposes. Instead of a tin-foil hat for our credit cards, how about we get a card system with some actual security?
Old 01-06-2012, 06:53 AM
  #10  
DTN
Moderator
 
DTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leesville, Louisiana
Posts: 11,731
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

Rfid makes sense on cell phones. Its not always on. You can't just swipe a cell phone and read its unique identifier.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 PM.