Could this create cheap electricity for everyone?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Providence, Rhode Island
Vehicle: 99 Tibby
Lockheed Martin announced that the Skunk Works has produced viable fusion technology and is looking for partners. “McGuire said the company had several patents pending for the work and was looking for partners in academia, industry and among government laboratories to advance the work.”
Tom McGuire, who heads the project, said he and a small team had been working on fusion energy at Lockheed’s secretive Skunk Works for about four years, but were now going public to find potential partners in industry and government for their work.
Initial work demonstrated the feasibility of building a 100-megawatt reactor measuring seven feet by 10 feet, which could fit on the back of a large truck, and is about 10 times smaller than current reactors, McGuire told reporters.
In a statement, the company, the Pentagon’s largest supplier, said it would build and test a compact fusion reactor in less than a year, and build a prototype in five years.
If the company’s predictions are accurate the development will transform almost every aspect of civilization. Back in 2013 Kelsey Atherton at Popular Science described the project in its earlier stages. “Much smaller than traditional fusion attempts, the compact fusion reactor uses a cylinder, not a ring, which makes for a stronger magnetic containment field and leaves fewer points where the energy could escape. This could make for a reactor that’s small enough for a truck to transport and still robust enough to generate power for 100,000 homes. Lockheed hopes to have a test model available by 2017, and scale up to regular production by 2022.”
The article also hints at the power density of the Lockheed fusion design. Gizmodo has more details and a diagram comparing the giant Tokamak type with its the Lockheed design. Unlike older designs, the proposed new model is scalable. Dr. Thomas McGuire said, “[The traditional tokamak designes] can only hold so much plasma, and we call that the beta limit. [Their plasma ratio is] 5% or so of the confining pressure. [...] We should be able to go to 100% or beyond.”
Skunk Works is convinced that their system—which will be the size of a jet engine—will be able to power everything, from spaceships to airplanes to vessels—and of course scale up to a much larger size…
[in 5 years] hey expect to have a fully operative model ready to go into full-scale production, capable of generating 100MW—enough to power a large cargo ship or a 80,000-home city—and measure 23 x 42 feet, so you “could put it on a semi-trailer, similar to a small gas turbine, put it on a pad, hook it up and can be running in a few weeks.”
Tom McGuire, who heads the project, said he and a small team had been working on fusion energy at Lockheed’s secretive Skunk Works for about four years, but were now going public to find potential partners in industry and government for their work.
Initial work demonstrated the feasibility of building a 100-megawatt reactor measuring seven feet by 10 feet, which could fit on the back of a large truck, and is about 10 times smaller than current reactors, McGuire told reporters.
In a statement, the company, the Pentagon’s largest supplier, said it would build and test a compact fusion reactor in less than a year, and build a prototype in five years.
If the company’s predictions are accurate the development will transform almost every aspect of civilization. Back in 2013 Kelsey Atherton at Popular Science described the project in its earlier stages. “Much smaller than traditional fusion attempts, the compact fusion reactor uses a cylinder, not a ring, which makes for a stronger magnetic containment field and leaves fewer points where the energy could escape. This could make for a reactor that’s small enough for a truck to transport and still robust enough to generate power for 100,000 homes. Lockheed hopes to have a test model available by 2017, and scale up to regular production by 2022.”
The article also hints at the power density of the Lockheed fusion design. Gizmodo has more details and a diagram comparing the giant Tokamak type with its the Lockheed design. Unlike older designs, the proposed new model is scalable. Dr. Thomas McGuire said, “[The traditional tokamak designes] can only hold so much plasma, and we call that the beta limit. [Their plasma ratio is] 5% or so of the confining pressure. [...] We should be able to go to 100% or beyond.”
Skunk Works is convinced that their system—which will be the size of a jet engine—will be able to power everything, from spaceships to airplanes to vessels—and of course scale up to a much larger size…
[in 5 years] hey expect to have a fully operative model ready to go into full-scale production, capable of generating 100MW—enough to power a large cargo ship or a 80,000-home city—and measure 23 x 42 feet, so you “could put it on a semi-trailer, similar to a small gas turbine, put it on a pad, hook it up and can be running in a few weeks.”
http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2014/10/15/fusion/
Super Moderator


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,795
Likes: 5
From: Pflugerville, TX
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
This is one of the more amusing aspects of capitalism: Lockheed has come up with what looks like a promising technology. They put out a press release to gin up financial support for the new, probably horrendously-expensive technology to be developed on someone else's dime. They don't have a new, truck-sized, destroys-nuclear-waste nuclear reactor. They have a new idea.
TIA
TIA
Administrator

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 2
From: Lacey, WA
Vehicle: Two Accents, Mini, Miata, Van, Outback, and a ZX-6
It's likely that this idea isn't vapor. I think it's actually less likely vapor since they're looking for partners.
It may not pan out, but if it does it will change the world significantly.
It may not pan out, but if it does it will change the world significantly.
Super Moderator


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,795
Likes: 5
From: Pflugerville, TX
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
If you are one of the larger corporations in the world and have something with (in relative terms) immediate payoff, you may not want investors. If you have something promising that will require huge truckloads of cash to develop and *may* not pay out, you want to use someone the money of someone else.


