Computers, Gaming, & Technology Here you can talk about anything with circuit boards, or dilithium crystals, or flux capacitors. Show off your technology, computing, and gaming knowledge.

AT&T buys T-mobile

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-21-2011, 07:58 AM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
Visionz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 23,223
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Vehicle: 2010 Genesis 2.0T
Default AT&T buys T-mobile

Ive been a T-mobile user for almost 8 years now. I've never once ever had any issues with them, the service, or the phones. This will be interesting to see what happens, as I'm sure only good things can come out of it. Better signal strength, more towers, more phone options to choose from, etc...



NEW YORK (AP) - AT&T Inc. said Sunday it will buy T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom AG in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $39 billion that would make it the largest cellphone company in the U.S.



The deal would reduce the number of wireless carriers with national coverage from four to three, and is sure to face close regulatory scrutiny. It also removes a potential partner for Sprint

Nextel Corp., the struggling No. 3 carrier, which had been in talks to combine with T-Mobile USA, according to Wall Street Journal reports.



AT&T is now the country's second-largest wireless carrier and T-Mobile USA is the fourth largest. The acquisition would give AT&T 129 million subscribers, vaulting it past Verizon Wireless' 102 million. The combined company would serve about 43 percent of U.S. cellphones.



For T-Mobile USA's 33.7 million subscribers, the news doesn't immediately change anything. Because of the long regulatory process, AT&T expects the acquisition to take a year to close. But when and if it closes, T-Mobile USA customers would get access to AT&T's phone line-up, including the iPhone.



The effect of reduced competition in the cellphone industry is harder to fathom. Public interest group Public Knowledge said that eliminating one of the four national phone carriers would be "unthinkable."



"We know the results of arrangements like this - higher prices, fewer choices, less innovation," said Public Knowledge president Gigi Sohn, in a statement.



T-Mobile has relatively cheap service plans compared with AT&T, particularly when comparing the kind that don't come with a two-year contract. AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said one of the goals of the acquisition would be to move T-Mobile customers to smart phones, which have higher monthly fees. AT&T "will look hard" at keeping T-Mobile's no-contract plans, he said.



AT&T's general counsel, Wayne Watts, said the cellphone business is "an incredibly competitive market," with five or more carriers in most major cities. He pointed out that prices have declined in the past decade, even as the industry has consolidated. In the most recent mega-deal, Verizon Wireless bought No. 5 carrier Alltel for $5.9 billion in 2009.



Stifel Nicolaus analyst Rebecca Arbogast said the deal will face a tough review by the Federal Communications Commission and the Justice Department. She expects them to look market-by-market at whether the deal will harm competition. Even if regulators approve the acquisition, she added, they are likely to require AT&T to sell off parts of its business or T-Mobile's business. Verizon had to sell off substantial service areas to get clearance for the Alltel



To mollify regulators, AT&T said in a statement Sunday that it would spend an additional $8 billion to expand ultrafast wireless broadband into rural areas. Instead of covering about 80 percent of the U.S. population with its so-called Long Term Evolution, or LTE network, AT&T's new goal would be 95 percent, it said. That means blanketing an additional area 4.5 times the size of Texas. The network is scheduled to go live in a few areas this summer, but the full build-out will take years.



The offer would help the FCC and the Obama administration meet their stated goals of bringing high-speed Internet access to all Americans. They see wireless networks as critical to meeting that goal - particularly in rural areas where it does not make economic sense to build landline networks.



AT&T said its customers would benefit from the cell towers and wireless spectrum the deal would bring. In some areas, it would add 30 percent more capacity, AT&T said.



"It obviously will have a significant impact in terms of dropped calls and network performance," Stephenson said.



AT&T would pay about $25 billion in cash to Deutsche Telekom, Germany's largest phone company, and stock that is equivalent to an 8 percent stake in AT&T. Deutsche Telekom would get one seat on AT&T's board.



Like Sprint, T-Mobile has been struggling to compete with much larger rivals AT&T and Verizon Wireless, and its revenue has been largely flat for three years. Bellevue, Wash.-based T-Mobile USA's subscriber count has stalled at just under 34 million, though it posts consistent profits.



Deutsche Telekom has been looking at radical moves to let it get more value out of its U.S. holding, including a possible combination with a U.S. partner.



There was a big hurdle to a T-Mobile USA-Sprint deal: The two companies use incompatible network technologies. The same hurdle would apply in a Verizon Wireless-T-Mobile USA deal. But the networks of AT&T and T-Mobile use the same underlying technology, so to some large extent, AT&T phones can already use T-Mobile's network, and vice versa.



The deal has been approved by the boards of both companies. Dallas-based AT&T can increase its cash portion by up to $4.2 billion, with a reduction in the stock component, as long as Deutsche Telekom receives at least a 5 percent equity ownership interest in the buyer.



The agreement doesn't leave room for other buyers to jump in with a higher bid, AT&T said.



AT&T would finance the cash part of the deal with new debt and cash on its balance sheet and will assume no debt from T-Mobile.
Old 03-21-2011, 08:51 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɯooɹpǝq ɹnoʎ
Posts: 13,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: ǝdnoɔ sısǝuǝƃ
Default

Sprint = Dead.
Old 03-21-2011, 10:29 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
bdiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Thomaston, CT
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2012 Veloster DCT w/ Tech
Default

Nice. No complaints from me if it gives my already good service more coverage.
Old 03-21-2011, 12:25 PM
  #4  
Super Moderator
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 10,795
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Elantra
Default

No complaints because you're too young to remember leasing your phone from The Phone Company, and the total lack of innovation in a monopoly-dominated market?
Old 03-21-2011, 02:02 PM
  #5  
DTN
Moderator
 
DTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leesville, Louisiana
Posts: 11,731
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

Competition drives the market.... however... the real innovation comes from the end users redesigning the smartphones. Take a look at xda-developers.com. the only thing I am worried about is prices. As far as phones go, all at&t does is load their phones with money making bloatware. If you click the wrong thing, you end up paying $10 extra per month.



I wish they would quit their "innovation" and move to just services. I want calling and internet... that's all I want from at&t. Hell, I could use skype and just use internet. The rest is provided by my hardware and software. I can see them charging even more for internet soon.... especially without competition.



Seriously.. if you look at what at&t ACTUALLY provides, its just a infrastructure. They have a fiber/cable backbone connected to the internet and a combination of owned and leased towers. Asside from the towers, they are charging for the same connection as your home internet. Your calls are made on a VLAN, over the internet on modern connections and charged by the minute.
Old 03-22-2011, 10:22 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
tibbykid91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2008 Tiburon
Default

Sucks if your a T-Mobile user, you will have to buy a new phone through AT&T or else your 3G wont work.

AT&T: T-Mobile 3G Phones Will Need To Be Replaced
Old 03-22-2011, 10:55 PM
  #7  
DTN
Moderator
 
DTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leesville, Louisiana
Posts: 11,731
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
Default

Btw... AT&T sold me a 3g phone with android 2.1... With a bit of tweaking, I now own a phone with Android 2.2 and HSPA (4g)... I dont really understand their logic on scaling back their phones like that.
Old 03-23-2011, 02:40 PM
  #8  
Moderator
 
bdiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Thomaston, CT
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2012 Veloster DCT w/ Tech
Default

Originally Posted by Stocker
No complaints because you're too young to remember leasing your phone from The Phone Company, and the total lack of innovation in a monopoly-dominated market?


LOL, perhaps, but unless you're 50 or so, i'm not a whole lot younger then you. 33 in May........




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 AM.