This is an 18+ section that may contain language, images, and video not suitable for work, marriages, children, or anyone opposed to graphic content. This could be our next first lady
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Grand Forks
Vehicle: 2005 Elantra
This could be our next first lady
http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article...lady-erections
trump1.jpg
trump2.jpg
trump3.jpg
trump4.jpg
trump5.jpg
trump1.jpg
trump2.jpg
trump3.jpg
trump4.jpg
trump5.jpg
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,166
Likes: 6
From: San Antonio, TEXAS!!!
Vehicle: 01 Tiburon Turbo, 99 Tiburon F2E, 2013 Avalon XLE Touring
OMG, really guys? I thought you were all passed the internet Debbie Downer stuff? I know she's not the hottest, and everyone has their own opinion of what is, but if she showed up in those outfits at your front door, I'm betting you'd throw down your bottle of Jergens lotion and pre-ejaculate all over her.
I bet every movie sucks and every supercar is slow and ugly as well.
I bet every movie sucks and every supercar is slow and ugly as well.
Super Moderator
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,735
Likes: 3
From: Vegas, Baby, Vegas!!!
Vehicle: '14 Ford F-150
I said, "not worth it". Meaning, for her to be First Lady would require a price I'm not willing to pay. Didn't say anything about her looks. But, for the record, I prefer chicks with ink.
Oh, and yes, most new movies do suck, because they're not new. They're reboots or the same old superhero story we've seen 14 times already. As for supercars, I prefer the angular 80's cars over the new swoopy ones. Even if the new ones are faster. '89 Anniversary Countach, for example.
Oh, and yes, most new movies do suck, because they're not new. They're reboots or the same old superhero story we've seen 14 times already. As for supercars, I prefer the angular 80's cars over the new swoopy ones. Even if the new ones are faster. '89 Anniversary Countach, for example.
