Braking, Wheels, Tires, Suspension Modifications to Brake Rotors, Calipers, Wheels, Tires, Springs, Struts, Coilovers, Swaybars, Strut Tower Braces, etc.

how r these tires?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-20-2002, 09:37 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TowsonShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default how r these tires?

i juts got my new wheels in today i bought them with the tires i thought i was getting kuhmo's with them but instead there is these tires on them i would like to know if these are descent tires thanks
they are: Ventus HR2 205/40r17 80h
U.T.Q.G. grade:
tread wear-340
traction-A
temperature-A
Tires made by HANKOOK which is a korean tire
thanks again oh and i got arospeed Riot (gold) 17x7 4x114.3 (97tib)
Old 11-21-2002, 04:20 AM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
Random's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 11,851
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Vehicle: 2008 Toyota Prius 2006 Suzuki SV650S
Default

Those tires are okay. I think Techcontib has those tires on his car. When I drove it, I didn't get the chance to "push" the car to test the limits of the tires...so I can't vouch for the grip they offer.
Old 11-21-2002, 04:26 AM
  #3  
Member
 
stickshift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Harrisburg Pa
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 Tiburon
Default



That's what it looks like...

For comparison's sake, here's the specs on the Kuhmo Ecsta Supra 712:

205/40WR17 80W 280 AA A

So the HAnkook has a higher treadwear rating, but the Kumho has a AA traction rating, while the Hankook has a A rating.

The Hankook has an "H" speed rating, which means it's good to 130 mph, while the Kuhmo has a "W" rating, which means it's good to 168 mph (all according to the tirerack.com).

Looks like a good tire. The Kuhmo might be better for racing, but for everyday driving, I think the Hankook should do the job very well.




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 AM.