2004 Srt-4 ?
09-18-2005, 08:42 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think he's really looking for a 600fwhp daily driven car...
WRX would fit him just right, IMO.
I said that SRT-4 can be made really quick, but you feel like shit sitting inside that box, and it's still FWD car...
Ham, you say that SRT-4s have no problems with their motors? You need to read SRT forums. I'm a member on there and I got my impression about reliability... and especially very reliable daily driven 500whp car... please! wake up man!
WRX would fit him just right, IMO.
I said that SRT-4 can be made really quick, but you feel like shit sitting inside that box, and it's still FWD car...
Ham, you say that SRT-4s have no problems with their motors? You need to read SRT forums. I'm a member on there and I got my impression about reliability... and especially very reliable daily driven 500whp car... please! wake up man!
09-19-2005, 06:18 AM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2001 Hyundai Tiburon
I'm just saying the SRT-4 would be the better stock\lightly modded car. They both can easily be made as fast as you want daily driven for cheap. Below 350, they are the same. So motor doesn't come into play.
Personally, I don't think the interior is that bad on either. Reading reviews on the Tib, a lot of people hated it... and I like it. Its their personal decision. I can say that the interior in my Mom's Subaru has held up very well after 100,000 miles.
As for looks, thats his decision as well. Both great cars, I'd go for the SRT though.
Personally, I don't think the interior is that bad on either. Reading reviews on the Tib, a lot of people hated it... and I like it. Its their personal decision. I can say that the interior in my Mom's Subaru has held up very well after 100,000 miles.
As for looks, thats his decision as well. Both great cars, I'd go for the SRT though.
09-19-2005, 02:59 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QUOTE (Joshuwa @ Sep 19 2005, 08:22 AM)
I kinda like the SRT-4, but the only thing that would make me not want one is, considering gas prices, having a Dodge Neon that gets 13 mpg isn't exactly good.
where did you get 13mpg?
09-19-2005, 03:15 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^
All over srtforums.com
A lot of new drivers on that site complain because the actual milage they get is not what they read on specs on the web.
Some report 24-25 mpg, but it seems to amaze other drivers as to how they do it.
http://www.srtforums.com/forums/archive/in...hp/t-86231.html
One user states:
I was considering an srt-4 once, but after reading around the forums for a while and learning about the severe wheel hop and bad milage, I changed my mind.
All over srtforums.com
A lot of new drivers on that site complain because the actual milage they get is not what they read on specs on the web.
Some report 24-25 mpg, but it seems to amaze other drivers as to how they do it.
http://www.srtforums.com/forums/archive/in...hp/t-86231.html
One user states:
QUOTE
i agree the sticker, 22/30 city/highway is definately a lie... my grandmother couldnt get 20mpg in this car if i let her drive it.
I was considering an srt-4 once, but after reading around the forums for a while and learning about the severe wheel hop and bad milage, I changed my mind.
09-19-2005, 03:30 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vehicle: 2000 carbon tiburon
I would get the sr-t over the stang.. ive seen what can be done and you can get stage 1 2 3 packages dirrectly from the dealership under warrenty.... who can complain about that.
