What do you choose?
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 2912
1982 Ferrari 308 GTSi aka the Magnum PI http://tomstrongman.com/wp-content/u.../FerrariFP.jpg |
A bicycle. There are no good 1973 cars.
|
The Corvette Stingray was still a good car back then before emissions standards f-ed them up. The 240Z was also nice.
|
Originally Posted by i8acobra
(Post 704060)
A bicycle. There are no good 1973 cars.
1973 Trans Am http://www.cherokeeforum.com/attachm...ine-fvl-lg.jpg 73 Dodge Charger http://www.corbettsauto.com/pictures...r/DSCF3854.JPG 73 Camaro https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...o_Z28_side.JPG 73 Corvette http://www.americandreamcars.com/1973corvette051905.jpg 73 Mustang http://www.autotraderclassics.com/im...6795/76795.jpg 73 Olds 442 http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclec...-442-1973a.jpg |
I was born in 77, so I would take an old Smokey & The Bandit Trans Am from that year...
https://cdn6.3dtuning.com/info/Ponti.../factory/7.jpg |
Originally Posted by Visionz
(Post 704063)
1973 Trans Am
73 Dodge Charger 73 Camaro 73 Corvette 73 Mustang 73 Olds 442 All unbelieveably slow compared to their 60's counterparts. The Vette's most powerful engine made 270 at the crank and it was the most powerful and lightest GM performance car available in '73. |
If I literally have to choose a car I would pick the 1980 Datsun 280ZX:
http://static.cargurus.com/images/si...678278338.jpeg If I can pick a vehicle it would be the 1980 Jeep CJ-7: https://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e...ps75f59dc3.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by i8acobra
(Post 704060)
A bicycle. There are no good 1973 cars.
http://imgdex.com/i/4f43d41ef2de8.jpgNothing else that year matters For me, despite the fact that it is slow, and actually kind of shitty to drive, horribly inefficient in every way possible, too wide, uncomfortable, and a damn brick; it's still iconic and gives zero f*cks: 1980 Lamborghini Countach LP400S https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ies_2_rear.jpg |
Originally Posted by Tibbi
(Post 704073)
You sir are out of your f*cking mind :nuts2:
http://imgdex.com/i/4f43d41ef2de8.jpgNothing else that year matters I live in the US... not Japan. |
88' is tough, everything was boxy and ugly for the most part.
I'm pretty sure the Pontiac fiero was the most popular car that year. :headshake: |
The Lamborghini Diablo has always been my favorite sports car, but in 1991 it was on its second year of production so it was still an infant. So I'll go with another choice.
Ferrari 512TR https://cdn4.3dtuning.com/info/Ferra.../factory/7.jpg (skip to 0:33 seconds) [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeLt55aPyyk[/media] or Ferrari Testarossa Koenig Competition Evolution (700ish HP) wish it had pop ups and the side fins though. http://alesupercars.weebly.com/uploa...41884_orig.jpg [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaDm9DIjnZA[/media] |
Ah, but you can put a kit on a Fiero and be driving nearly anything.
|
Originally Posted by i8acobra
(Post 704074)
I live in the US... not Japan.
Originally Posted by SR Tech
(Post 704075)
88' is tough, everything was boxy and ugly for the most part.
I'm pretty sure the Pontiac fiero was the most popular car that year. :headshake: 1988 was a
And that's just the start of the list.
Originally Posted by Stocker
(Post 704078)
Ah, but you can put a kit on a Fiero and be driving nearly anything.
|
^ I agree with any of those choices :beercheers:
|
Originally Posted by Tibbi
(Post 704091)
That doesn't mean you have choose something big, heavy and over rated. :duh5:
No, but it does have to be legal to buy, own and drive here. In '73, the Skyline was not. |
But in 2015 the '73 Skyline is.
|
Originally Posted by i8acobra
(Post 704102)
No, but it does have to be legal to buy, own and drive here. In '73, the Skyline was not.
|
Technicalities aside, the Skyline was neither practical nor reasonable for someone to buy in '73 and would not be considered by any American in '73 as a desirable car. If it were, it would have been sold here.
|
Sorry but I scrolled through those links you posted and I MAY have liked 2 of them.
And I would agree mr2 > fiero. I was just referring to what was more prominent then. |
Originally Posted by i8acobra
(Post 704115)
Technicalities aside, the Skyline was neither practical nor reasonable for someone to buy in '73 and would not be considered by any American in '73 as a desirable car. If it were, it would have been sold here.
|
|
Originally Posted by SR Tech
(Post 704116)
Sorry but I scrolled through those links you posted and I MAY have liked 2 of them.
Originally Posted by i8acobra
(Post 704115)
Technicalities aside, the Skyline was neither practical nor reasonable for someone to buy in '73 and would not be considered by any American in '73 as a desirable car. If it were, it would have been sold here.
That BMW tho :beercheers: A wise decision that one is. |
Originally Posted by Tibbi
(Post 704126)
Originally Posted by i8acobra' timestamp='1427242079' post='704115
... would not be considered by any American in '73 as a desirable car. If it were, it would have been sold here. Well you also have to consider the times. The Skyline was not imported as it would have been a market disaster. At the time Americans were buying primarily American made cars as most imports of the day lacked the quality that USDM manufacturers were known for. Likewise, there was still some country pride involved as well as a LOT of residual anger toward the Japanese. It hadn't been but a few short decades since they bombed our base in Hawaii, dragging us into WW2. Likewise the Skyline was long considered the flagship model for Nissan, and they had just as much displeasure for the US at the time. In return, we got a very small number of compact options and the Fairlady Z, the obligatory sport option that received a cult following. The Skyline would have been put against the pony cars and muscle cars of the day and both sides of the pond understood it wouldn't last. The 2 door Skyline is basically just a boxy Z with a smaller motor, where the 4 door was way too small for what the consumers were purchaing at the time. On top on that consider the cost, importing a vehicle back then was taxed much more harshly than today, a 4 door base skyline would command Cadillac money; and that would not sell well in the slightest. In fact, the early model Skyline Sport (BLRA-3) was rebodied by Michelotti in the 60's, when Prince was still the brand name prior to the merger that would form Nissan. This model called the Skyline Sport was intended to introduce the brand to Europe, and a convertible version was made and shown at some US auto shows. However due to the size and country of origin it was largely ignored. It was surely not for lack of trying on Nissan's part. However consider that today it is indeed a very desirable and collectible car. Mostly due to name sake an pop culture, but it was very much the perfect blend of European styling with comfort and options most of the Euros of the time lacked desperately. Also thanks to a the environmental conditions of Japan, many have been lost to corrosion. So it's also slightly more rare than many of the American cars of the 60s and 70s. You realize you just took the long way to say exactly what I said, right? :beercheers: |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands